April 25, 2006

Three David Gross lectures at Princeton this week

Filed under: physics - alexei @ 6:01 am

David Gross, physics professor at UC-Santa Barbara and 2004 Novel Prize laureate for the discovery of asymptotic freedom, is giving a series of public lectures this week entitled "The Search for a Theory of Fundamental Reality." Taking place April 25-27 in the Helm Auditorium, McCosh 50, at 8pm, the series break-down is:

"Theory of Elementary Particles" on Tuesday
"Questions and Speculations: The Search for a Unified Theory" on Wednesday
"The Coming Revolutions: Toward a New Understanding of Space and Time" on Thursday

Also of interest, though in a competing time-slot, there is a computational mathematics lecture "Quantum Computers: How Physics Experiments Might Solve Mathematical Problems" by Peter Shor of MIT, at 8pm in A02 McDonnell.

Princeton Calendar of Events

April 20, 2006

Gamma waves and meditation

Filed under: cogsci, meditation, brain, magnetism, consciousness - alexei @ 8:46 am

Depending on what we are thinking, how hard we are concentrating, our brain chemistry, environment, and a number of other factors, our brains have a certain electromagnetic signature, a wave frequency, which we can measure with available technology, namely electroencephalographs (EEG). Traditionally, these continuous rhythmic sinusoidal EEG waves were classified into four types: delta, theta, alpha and beta waves. Delta had a frequency range up to 4 Hz, associated with infants and children. Theta ranged from 4-8 Hz, and was linked with adolescence, trance and the preconscious state just before waking. Alpha (Berger’s) waves, 8-12 HZ, were tied to relaxed, alert consciousness. While, Beta waves, 12 Hz and above, were related to anxious thinking and active concentration. However, as increasing evidence for higher frequency brain activity came to light, Gamma waves lay claim the 26-80 Hz range, known euphemistically as “coherent 40 Hz oscillations.” These waves seem to go together with higher mental processes, perception and consciousness, making them the brain waves you probably want to have.

Gamma waves do not result from axonal-dendritic synapses, but rather from dentro-dendritic gap junctions that form after a synapse activation that links neurons together. Neurons connected by gap junctions have one common membrane, fire simultaneously and generally behave like a single giant neuron. These mega-neurons have membranes that depolarize coherently and can spread across different parts of the cortex (potentially allowing for brain-wide states). Normally, these networks are transient, as gap junctions form and dissolve constantly. But, recent research showing that practiced meditators like Tibetan monks can muscle 25-42 Hz easy, with some pushing 80-120 Hz, suggests that it is possible to keep the gap junctions open longer.

The relation between meditation and high wave frequency is not surprising, since the middle frequency (12-16 Hz), the sensorimotor rhythm, goes together with physical stillness. Just sitting still for a while is already half-way to Gamma. From there on, it almost seems it is just a matter of how much of your brain you have under control. Heightened consciousness, known as Samadhi in the meditation traditions, is an experience unclouded by cognitive contents. One usually arrives at it gradually, after years of practice, disciplining the mind that delights in distraction, learning how to focus all attention on a single thing. To focus completely on a single thing means to be able to let go of everything else. So, once you can do that, you can rid yourself from all undesired cognitive contents and enjoy a pure unmediated experience of reality. Now, if the Gamma wave frequency goes up as more of the brain is connected through gap junctions, it seems that advanced practitioners are simply able to network more of their brains, having trained to concentrate their minds. The benefits of meditation do not all wear off, advanced practitioners have a higher baseline gamma synchrony, suggesting a higher general awareness, concentration and consciousness. Other research has shown that meditation also thickens grey matter in parts of the cortex where it normally gets thinner with age. 

Breakthrough study on EEG of meditation, Stuart Hameroff MD, Director, Center for Consciousness Studies, U. of Arizona-Tucson

April 19, 2006

Neuron signals digital and analog simultaneously

Filed under: cogsci, brain - alexei @ 2:47 am

Researchers at the Yale School of Medicine found that brain cells use a mixture of analog and digital signals. Neurons communicate with each other by sending neurotransmitters through axons (output) and synapses (input). When a cell receives transmitters through a synapse, the voltage inside the cell fluctuates. If there is enough voltage to pass a certain threshold, it generates an action potential, sending a specialized waveform out the axon, thus releasing a transmitter to the next neuron in the chain, which sends one to the next, and so on until the power runs out. This helps overturn the old belief that signals between neurons were sent solely through rate and timing of the action potentials, digitally.

Moreover, they found that the analog signal already present in a nuron is also sent down the axon, further influencing the synaptic transmission. So, the sent waveform is altered with each neuron it passes through. As the voltage of the sending signal becomes more positive, the amplitude of future transmissions is enhanced. This explains in part how neuron nets that store our experiences are formed. David McCormick, neurobiology professor at Yale and senior author of the study, says: "It’s as if everyone thought communication in the brain was like a telegraph, but actually it turned out to be more similar to a telephone."

Brain Communicates in Analog and Digital Modes Simultaneously, Yale.edu 

April 18, 2006

Lackoff’s lecture on cognitive science and the culture wars

Filed under: cogsci, politics - alexei @ 8:27 am

George Lakoff, professor of Linguistics at University of California-Berkeley delivered a lecture entitled "Ethics Freedom, and the Death of Rationalism: What Cognitive Science Tells Us About the Culture Wars" April 13 at Princeton University. Here’s a brief summary of what I heard.

    There is an obsolete notion still hanging around from the Enlightenment, it is that Reason exists independently of us, in a conscious, logical, universal and literal way, which leads many to imagine ideas to be invisible entities flying around in the air. This conception, the folk theory of rationality, has largely been proven false by cognitive science. Ideas exist embodied in our heads. They form in neuron clusters, synapses linked in nets across different parts of the brain. The diffuse nature of these clusters is why people don’t usually lose their concepts to brain-damage in any one particular area. When a concept is ingrained, as through repetition, the neuron cluster gets stronger, effecting the physical structure of the brain, which makes deep-seated concepts especially hard to get rid of.
    Not all neurons are the same. For example, with mirror neurons, clusters fire when you perform an action or see that action performed by someone else. It is believed that they allows us to feel empathy, the ability to identify with others. There are also certain neurons that fire when you perform an action or see something you can perform the action on. It is through complex systems of different neuron clusters firing with each new thought and feeling that we understand the world around us.
    We frame many of our concepts in language as metaphors. The metaphors that prevail in most people’s brains is what we call common sense. One such metaphor is that of the nation as a family (patria, the fatherland, Mother India, Mother Russia). For most, the family metaphor among the most deeply ingrained, since it has its roots in childhood. However, depending on the household one grew up in, this metaphor can have different implications, especially when applied on a large scale.
    The essential split seems to be between the strict father (or parent) and the nurturing mother models, with the father identified with conservatism and Republicans and the mother with liberalism and Democrats. In the strict father model the basic premise is that the parent needs to be strict because the world is evil and rife with competition. Besides, kids are born ignorant and bad, and need discipline and punishment to develop physical and mental strength to survive in the world. So, from this viewpoint, social programs are seen as undesirable, because they create freeloading dependents, who do not learn how to survive on their own the hard way. Government allows for big business to do whatever, because competition is healthy for everybody. Meanwhile, lesser nations are treated as children, and just as a parent does not ask the children how he is supposed to raise them, neither does a government compromise its sovereignty, but tells them what to do and when. The parent know what is best for the children is also how the government can approach defend spying on its citizens.
    The nurturing mother model is centered around empathy and compassion. The idea is that by being nurtured, children grow up to be nurturers of others. Freedom is key for nurture, so discipline is limited in favor of positive reinforcement. Fairness is seen as necessary for prosperity, so big business is kept small. There is also a stronger concern for peace. Lackoff expands on this theory in his book "Don’t Think of an Elephant, Know Your Values and Frame the Debate."

GeorgeLackoff.com
"Don’t Think of an Elephant"
"Metaphors We Live By"
"Moral Politics"

April 10, 2006

Dreams taking flight

Filed under: Uncategorized - Administrator @ 8:17 pm

For an amalgam of reasons I’ve decided to move Dreadful Dreams to Blogsome. This is a test post. Number 9, number 9, number 9, number 9…

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by Alex King